Originally Posted by Rachel

My god, they were DANCING!!!!!


Chocolate city is a bar and grill, not a sex house. If you go to the chocolate city website there is a picture of people DANCING in the same pose are there front page. that's where I pulled the idea off the pose from. Have all of you really never happened across a music video of this style of dance in the last 19 years. Dancing.
And to address what hammer said. I didn't post it in order to create some sort of reaction or for the shock value. Because I didn't even think it could ever been implied that they were engaging in sexual intercourse in a parking lot while black ripcord watches. That's crazy. There toys with clothes on. And yes I had been warned or infracted upon or whatever. But this picture was not an attempt to over step the boundaries or push the envelope. I heeded my warnings wasn't trying to piss anyone off or freak anyone out. It was dancing.
I saw a bar with an freaking funny name and thought the picture was hilarious! That fact that you were all so offended by it is truly mind boggling to me. I guess I should have waited till wacky weds or said they were dancing. But I never thought it could be perceived as sex. Doc's still got his pants on! You took it down, you deleted my account whatever. I will not apologize for the photo as my intent was not to promote sex in the outdoors or prostitution Or whatever, I will apologize for offending you. I guess it's about perception I did not think you people who are offended what take it so out of context. What kind of dude do y'all think I am? I don't have any sex in my dios no naked customs, nothing close to that and probably never will. I totally 100 percent agree with the new rule of no sex scenes. I do. Because that was not what my shot was about. Sex with toys is retarded. The focal point was supposed to be the sign. Not the other silliness. And that's what is was as that's what all of this is, silliness. It was not sex folks, it was dancing. I am so sorry that so many people perceived it as otherwise. People on flickr seem to love it! It's funny. It's really funny. Chocolate city for the name of a bar where most patrons are African American is funny. This is my apology. I'm sorry to upset soooooooooooooooooooooo many people. I was not trying to disregard my warnings and cause a ruckus. It was just a joke about a bar. Ironically it got even more exposure because of this silly banning crap than it ever would have got if you had paid no attention to it or just deleted it and pm'd me, "hey inappropriate, your on a short leash, you trying to get banned yo?l" it could then have been explained. But to have such a knee jerk reaction to such radical misinterpretation did a lot more harm to this joint than the picture ever did. That sucka would probably be on page 6 and there wouldn't be a million posts about the dancing figs. I'm sorry you all didn't get the joke but hey at least you shook the place up a bit. This is the most posts I've seen here in months. That's all I got, I hope you all don't misinterpret this post. Thanks to everyone that has stood up for me and for all the nice pm's. the banning was an injustice, not because what you did was wrong, but because it was over a confused perception of an otherwise awesome photo. I'm out.


Please excuse in typos punctuation etc, this post is coming from my cell
No sex in the champagne room. I got it, the boys scouts of America are watching.

Originally Posted by Rachel

I guess it's about perception I did not think you people who are offended what take it so out of context. What kind of dude do y'all think I am?

Originally Posted by Hammerfel

I think a bad reputation can make people assume the worst.

Thanks for clarifying it the content. That move in dancing is mimicking sex as well, though, so it's easy to see why people would assume the worst.

Originally Posted by Hammerfel

I think a bad reputation can make people assume the worst.

Thanks for clarifying it the content. That move in dancing is mimicking sex as well, though, so it's easy to see why people would assume the worst.

Originally Posted by t34bag

it's with a sense of great pride that I remove my picture of Helix and Scarlett. if I can inspire great controversy over a kiss then I truly am a great dio artist and have touched all of you

Originally Posted by Rachel

But the clarification does not erase the ban eh? Do I just stick with this account then? Is that cool? If I can come back, just not as "fireflyed", that's cool, crazy silly(my favorite word) but cool. I would just make a new account and have two like GScarlet/flint and the rest of the "old guard"(whatever that means) but I think having two accounts is kind of silly
As far as reputation goes, I have a great reputation and rapport with members not named Sonn, LRaven, GScar. (as this whole debacle has shown). Hell, this whole mess actually made me friends with matt again. Crazy.

So what's the deal?

Originally Posted by Agent Viper

It is pretty crazy Cory, now we can go hit on older women on Face Book!

Originally Posted by Rachel

Well played sir. Well played!

Originally Posted by Roland da Thompson Gunner

You know the thing that bothered me the most about it was the fact that it was really just photos designed to appeal to people's prurient interests and hidden behind "Essay on posing"