View Single Post

Old 02-01-2009, 11:41 PM #29
haradrel
Resolute fanboi
 
haradrel's Avatar
 
Offline
-->
Posts: 4,184
haradrel is on a distinguished road -->
Join Date: Jan 2008

Send a message via MSN to haradrel
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Death_at_Midnight

The whole trend to re-imagine a brand seems to be commonplace recently. I was first deeply annoyed when Harmony Gold chosed to re-imagine Robotech (I'm a big time Robotech fan) when there wasn't truly a need to do so. With GI Joe, the story line with ARAH is fantastic, the formula obviously worked. Changing too much and then you have a fork in the story lines.. two camps, the classic and the film. There's enough branching of so many Joe storylines that it's confusing. Classic GI Joe verses the Intruders, GI Joe verses COBRA, Sigma 6, Sunbow cartoon, those other cartoons, Cobra-la, battleforce 2000, etc. Now the film line.

Keep the classic ARAH storyline, a re-telling but true to the original formula.


This is the problem I think. To many ideas of what G.I.Joe should be. Everybody has their take on it because there are so many verses, and you can't please everybody. You liked the ARAH storyline - which I think is an amalgem of the sunbow cartoons and the marvel run.
They obviously have taken a footnote from sigma six with the suits probably to capture the newest generation as well as make it easier with the action shots (they can get away with way more with the suits on).

They can't please everybody - as long as they keep the initial theme and feeling there I'll be happy.
__________________
Arguing on the internet is like competing in the special Olympics - You may win, but you are still retarded
  Reply With Quote