Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Outrider
So, your opinions are fact, and mine are just opinions....well go figure! Guess I must have been mistaken all along. No constructive criticism? I would have thought pointing out their faults is just that. "25th sux" is what I call non constructive criticism. And didn't I read somewhere in your first post a line about not disrespecting other people's views?
|
No - I pointed out which were facts and which were opinions quite clearly. - The scale and poseability.
The rest are up for debate - I strongly feel that the 25th are more rigid and prone to not breaking as the original line was with crotches and thumbs (for example).
I do see your point - but it actually is a fact that they are a closer scale - I can speak from 3 years of experience at art school for that one.
And I still think they offer a lot more poseability then the originals - but as Urban Saboteur pointed out this might be up for debate - Though I'll address that issue later and show why more points of articulation gives better poseability.
My point was not that your criticisms here was non-constructive - quite the opposite - but that in general we get a lot of bashing for the 25th line even in places where it shouldn't be.
I never disrespected your views, in fact I agreed with most of them and even said that I respected your point of view because you came from a background of collecting joes over time. Respect mine please.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Urban Saboteur
You should probably both accept you have differing views on it and move on..
|
Its still civil
I will however agree to disagree if something gets to heated and leave it at that - right now we seem to be having a difference in taste is all.