JoeDios.com Forums

JoeDios.com Forums (https://www.joedios.com/forum/index.php)
-   JoeDioes.com Forum (https://www.joedios.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Fireflyed (https://www.joedios.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4137)

Rachel 06-08-2010 09:07 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambo
C'mon Ian! Hershel's was a diostory! a good one short dio.
And Death one is harmless.


What was harmful about Cory's? Did he not provide a description that in turn made his a photo a "short" dio-story? Why was Cory's recent photo not JD worthy Rambo? The member, Roland, provided worse examples, why was my husband singled out? I am a little ditsy, but I could have sworn you posted earlier in favor of his reinstatement. What changed Rambo? I am by know means attempting to say that he is perfect, he is not at ALL, but even a amateur gi joe gal like me can see that his posts were far from the worst things posted here. Was the set not up to joedios standards? And if it wasn't, what pre-13 year old can possible meet the excellence of standards that are set by veteran users here? The "rules and regulations" are so skewed here. And my husband has been banned for something that literally measures up as inconsequential when measured against other foul products from previous uploads to this site. I am beginning to understand why Cory was so upset.
-Rachel(the real Rachel)

Cory is driving me crazy. Just take him back already! I want to sleep tonight and not have joedios be the only thing he talks about!

Rambo 06-08-2010 09:07 PM

I like McD but the best burguers here are the ones being sold on the streets.

PS. For Rachel: I would like him back.

Sonneilon 06-08-2010 09:12 PM

Rachel, read the rules and regulations.

Then be aware of the past pms FF and I have had about his behavior and attitude.

Then be aware of the numerous complaints lodged about his latest photo and this thread.

Hammerfel 06-09-2010 12:00 PM

I started a policy thread on this here: http://www.joedios.com/forum/showth...35817#post35817

Two of our esteemed members have hit the nail on the head with this issue, first, Scarlett:
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Scarlett
I don't want to stir up a hornet's nest here, but let's grow up.


The simple fact is that 'common sense' needs to be employed at all times when dealing with a 'public forum' that is essentially owned by 1 person. Through the graciousness of Hammerfel we are all able to congregate and share pictures and stories and 'shoot the sh*t' on a daily basis.
While for the most part we're all 'grown up', we still need to remember that there are rules. And when someone pushes the envelope too far, they have to deal with the consequences.

Yes, its *fun* and lively to get involved in things that should stay private, but its also not cool to fan the flames and bash the people who have been tasked with keeping the peace. Believe me, I know.

While I've got nothing against anyone personally, I do know the people who were less than gracious toward me during my tenure here. And a number of them were people who were being nice to my face while stabbing me in the back. But I didn't hold a grudge against anyone. I let bygones be bygones and when I was asked by 'the powers that be' to come back and reclaim my place as a 'valued, veteran member', I agreed.

I've kept to myself and continued posting the same positive, encouraging posts that I've maintained from the beginning. But seeing this flame war being fanned, I feel the need to put my .03 in.

If people want to cause drama, you can't stop them. But by egging it on, you simply ensure its continuance. Look at what Matt did......when I left, he had opened-and been banned-by over a half dozen SN's. And we all know that most of the 'old guard' have more than one account here on JoeDios (a bonus that is not accepted on nearly every other Joe board)..so while lamenting the 'banning' of the SN gives some 'meat' to the boredom, its not like a different account can't be used (which has already been done in this thread).

I know that its fun to jump on the bandwagon and get into everybody else's business, but when all the facts are not known, it just serves to derail a good site and its members from the purpose of said site. Let the affected parties hash it out via PM's and don't get involved in business that doesn't concern you personally.

The fact that people were complaining (or whatever happened), shows that it was done by some who have taken the 'high road' and gone along the proper channels to inform the staff of whatever questionable actions were going on (I don't know about the picture in question, I had only seen the thumbnail and didn't get a chance to click on it before it was taken down). Irregardless, as some have stated, there is a flickr account, so the shot can (most likely) be viewed there.


So, everybody should just go back to doing what this site is REALLY all about-taking pictures of plastic army men........

'Nuff Said!


And Death at Midnight:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Death_at_Midnight
Here's my .02 cents:

Sonneilon has a tough job to do. He is not the type ban someone lightly.

As a former site moderator myself, moderating is a tough job, especially to volunteer for. I've had to ban ppl in the past: some I had to act quickly because the site had a live chat component--there were hackers, and there were times when the only way to ban a hacker was to ban everyone from that user's address, reguardless of the innocent. And it had always left me with an ugly feeling.

Yet often times the site itself has to come first because there are other ppl here. Some are children. JD has no mechanism for parental controls or any movie-style rating/warning, and often times what is one person's standard of morality is not the standard of another. JD is an international site, and there are things done in the US culture that does not translate well to other cultures. In many ways, the mod has to stick with the lowest common denominator that is acceptible for a wide audience. Else the site could even be taken down for such things as improper content to minors, etc.

For a good hearted person, of which Sonneilon is, banning is not a simple issue, and banning is a lot more complex than it may seem.


Sonneilon PM'd me about his action. I have to apologize for not posting sooner. My son is graduating 2nd grade, switching schools, and just finished up his Wolf year in Cub Scouts, and at work, a co-worker is moving on to another company and I have the annual E3 Expo to prep for next week, so I've been pretty busy. :)

To the photo in question, it was too suggestive for my tastes, especially as a stand-alone shot. I'm not opposed to sexy scenes in dio stories, as long as they further the plot, like the Scarlett / Helix shot linked above contributed to that story.

Think of it this way. When you see a one-shot photo of a man behind a bent over woman, simulating sex, that's just a titillating photo meant to get a reaction out of the viewer. It akin to soft-core porn. When you watch a movie, and the same scene takes pace between lovers, it (hopefully) enriches the story and develops the characters. Heck, even I have a "sex scene " in one of my dios, but it develops my character of Kamakura have "the ear that sees" and involves known lovers, Lady Jaye and Flint.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:10 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.