That's kinda what I was thinking.

I thought they changed the rules so you had to write a comment in order to cast a vote on a photo. Maybe it's just my browser (Chrome). I was a bit confused when I'd see a 3 star rating with a comment raving about what a great photo it was.

Also, I can't say 5-stars is perfection. I cast only 5s really, since 4 is mediocre and 3 bums people out. 1 star must be an out-of-focus, webcam on your parents' Welcome doormat or something (I won't bother rating, cos you've gotta know it's a poor shot already). So a 5-star shot ranges from pretty damn good to outstanding. And I'll tell you what I think anyway.

falcon if i miss read your comment then i appologize. but if i have then please let me know that i have

i agree with you guys on the ratings. it should not be annonomys. you should have to leave your opinion if youre going to rate a pic and say why you think it deserves the rating of whatever you decide to give to that pic

this is what i have a problem with

NO NO NO. all is wrong ! I never give one star for you. When I see one star in your shot got me the attention. "Why" a cool pic in rating so bad? who was? somebody this giving bad stars and you´re one more with the problem.
Dan and me says that words for the bad guy..who is?

:D :D :D :D

So what you're saying is you saw the problem, a low star rating, on pictures posted by Footloose, AgentViper and RTG, you not saying these guys are the problem.
We can just chalk that little misunderstanding to "Lost in Translation"

my appologies then to Falcon. Lost in translation is correct.
looks like there is a mysterious 1 starer out there. who is this evil person

1 star
 

I think Footloose you do great stuff, I like the crross over stuff. Your skillss are without question. You and everybody else do a great job. Now that we know someone is being a jerk and just giving one star for everybody's pictures it shouldn't carry as much weight. Just think of him as the one star jerk and move on