That actually will end up being the final factor lehsreh, once the 'sub-sections' of the forum are put into place.

For instance, 'Good/Bad Traders', 'Latest Booty' & 'Wants/Needs/NOW HAVES' will occupy one sub section.......and so on and so forth.


I know that it seems like a lot of stickies gang, but with the site 'archiving' threads after the first 3-5 pages (depending)....it's not so bad.....for now.

I do want to get the sub-forums up and running. It will make the navigating that much easier in the forum. So it won't be long now, I hope! :p


Actually, as it stands, there are 10 *OFFICIAL* stuck threads and 2-3 plain 'stickies'.....so at least half of the forum page is still relatively new material.

:cool:

*claps for Frank*

At the risk of being band, I would just like to make my point. And even though you said to pm you on said subject, I feel as if that is, maybe, a form of censorship, being that my voice isn't heard. Now anywho...

I know I have only been here a little under a year but I have never seen or read where anyone bitches about you GS or beraids you or belittles you etc etc. What I have seen is that in quite a few of your posts there is a air of contempt and self defecations. Like Frank said, you are the one who says everyone hates you and your unappreciated, and you are the one who cries about not getting credit or respect. Maybe I'm wrong, seriously I might be, but it just seems like most of the time you are quite discontent. It is fine for a member on any given day to be pissed, but as a moderater it is not (in my opinion) ok for you to take on a public persona throughout the site, of always being ticked or a martyer and then get upset when you are called on it. YOU ARE NOT ABOVE CRITICISM. WE AS MEMBERS OF THE SITE HAVE A RIGHT TO THE SAY. You are a moderator not a dictator. You have taken you position and transformed it into one that has the "power" to incure significant change and punishment instead of handling site up keep.

This whole business started because you said "its nice to know people are talking about me" or something like that. Like I said earliar, to me it was just another example of you being upset over nothing. Could it just be that people had question about the changes? I know I couldnt find a thread I was looking for. And I think the main thing, is that because of the tendency you have to blow up over nothing, Graham is just more approachable when you have questions or concerns. I'm sure some people might discuss you, as I'm sure some people don't like me. But people going to Graham is a product of your own vitural persona. I have nothing against you what so ever, but I didn't twist your arm to change anything. As a matter of fact, I liked the way it was. I just get sick of being lumped into the category of the "haters" of you and reading about how horrible you have it. And as far as the "claps", I appluad frank and rich as well. Regardless of what they wrote and there view, it is impressive they had the balls to give there opinion on the matter. O'well I'm shrugging this off, I hope I'm not band.